![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](http://nsfordwriter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Jane-Eyre-2011-1024x642.png)
Banned Books Week - September 24th - October 1st.Five Best Books: This Week - The Banned and the Ch.Tuesday's Overlooked Films: ONE POTATO, TWO POTATO.
![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81J+5nzD11L._AC_SY445_.jpg)
Top Ten Tuesday: Ten Books I Want To Re-Read.What I Watched Last Night: THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU s.Rain, rain, go away, come again another day.!.Friday's Forgotten Books: SPEAKING OF MURDER Inter.Okay, Bring On the Baseball Post Season!!.In that case you cannot possibly replicate what the mind is bound to conjure up. What makes these books timeless is the readers' imagination. This may also go back to the point that I have always made about film adaptations of novels - especially well cherished ones. What I find ends up happening is my ideal pairing is a combination of one from one movie with the other from another film.Īnd if I can be completely honest, I am not sure that any portrayal of Rochester can match what Charlotte Bronte was able to achieve in text. It is a tricky balance getting the Jane/Rochester right. I quite liked the BBC Adaptation and the Welles/Fontaine one too. What I especially liked about this film were the tonal elements - the interior and exterior atmosphere was very tense indeed. Yes he is not the Byronic hero that is imagined in the source material, but I may be biased because I generally like his body of work. We are on the opposite ends of the spectrum on this one.
![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](https://theartsdesk.com/sites/default/files/images/stories/FILM/Emma_Simmonds/jamie-bell.jpg)
I feel similar about the film adaptations of Wuthering Heights my favorite is the 1939 version, I liked Timothy Dalton as Heathcliff, but no actress has truly embodied the fascinating and mercurial character that is Cathy. Scott as Rochester and including Jane Eyre (1996) with William Hurt and Charlotte Gainsbourg, but none have matched the passion and power of the novel. I have watched the film adaptations of Jane’s story that you mention, with the exception George C. This might sound like so much nitpicking, but I rate the film interpretations based on a single line from the book, “Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain and little, I am soulless and heartless?” Many film versions feel the need to “rephrase” Jane’s sentiments this version got the line correct but so much else wrong. The trailer and DVD container praise Cary Fukunaga’s “bold new vision,” which I was concerned meant physical intimacy between Jane and Rochester (the 2006 PBS version tried to imply as much). I also had mixed feelings after watching this version of Jane Eyre last Tuesday evening. So let's go from the worse to the best in one single leap: I wonder if these women eat anything at all. (And yes, I accounted for corset underpinnings.) Some of the camera shots pointed out this thinness and not, necessarily, in a good way. The waists of several of the actresses could not have been more than 20 inches, if that. One final note: The young women in this movie, Jane included, are SO alarmingly thin that I wondered if the film had been altered in some way. Not that Fairfax is a huge role in any production, but why waste Judy Dench? Fairfax and has literally nothing to do, can't imagine why she was cast. In certain scenes it was impossible to understand what some characters were saying. The entire production has a dark and forbidding look and the Thornfield set is good. The moody cinematography by Adriano Goldman is excellent as is the direction by Cary Fukunaga despite some scene set-ups which appeared a little awkward. Mia Wasikowska is fine as Jane, but there is NO chemistry to speak of with Fassbender. Let's face it, JANE EYRE on screen is a gothic romance (the book as well, I suppose) but the movie rests completely on the back of good casting. A good Rochester and a good Jane Eyre is imperative.